I believe that DC versus Heller was badly decided. But since I'm not a lawyer and I agree that people should have a regulated right to own a gun under some circumstances. There are two fundamental reasons for this:
- One: You can't sever the right to bear arms from the requirements for a "militia of the whole."
- Two: The term "bear" is not synonymous with "carry" it means to use a weapon in a military/self defense capacity, not simply walk around with a weapon in ones hand.