In an article titled: Post-Roger Stone: Ten ideas for repairing Trump’s justice system By Jennifer Rubin, She writes:
“President Trump granting clemency to his crony Roger Stone, who served as the go-between for the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks, on practically the eve of Stone’s incarceration for multiple crimes attendant to his coverup on behalf of the president, is grotesquely corrupt but unsurprising.”
She recounts the latest Cassus Belli of Trump's perfidy
She notes that “Stone virtually confessed to a quid pro quo,” (To me he was boasting), telling Howard Fineman,
“He [Trump] knows I was under enormous pressure to turn on him. It would have eased my situation considerably. But I didn’t.”
I don't think anyone with integrity doesn't feel that this wasn't a high crime and a misdemeanor.Rubin writes:
“Silence for clemency. A separate system of justice for the president’s henchmen. This is the very definition of corruption.”Former Candidate Romney put it baldly in a tweet:
"Unprecedented, historic corruption: an American president commutes the sentence of a person convicted by a jury of lying to shield that very president." Link to TweetShe reports:
“By this action, President Trump abused the powers of his office in an apparent effort to reward Roger Stone for his refusal to cooperate with investigators examining the President’s own conduct,”She also reports how House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) said in a written statement released Friday:
“No other president has exercised the clemency power for such a patently personal and self-serving purpose.”Actually, her hero George Herbert Walker Bush, exercised his clemency and pardon powers in 1992 for just such a patently corrupt and self serving cause when he pardoned the perps in the Iran Contra scandal. But what counts with Republicans is what they are doing now, so I can forgive past crimes as long as folks have seen the light. This post is about her suggestions for fixing the problems. I'm endeavering to analyze the problem by critiquing her suggestions. Most of them are obvious or things that were taken out of the law due to misuse or to protect the wrong people. Any reforms made should be based on firm Constitutional Grounds. And if that is not adequate, it might take a Constitutional Amendment.